[Framework-Team] PLIP Process

Discussion:

Ramon Navarro Bosch

2015-11-23 16:04:53 UTC

Hey as I can remember we decided to stop dev.plone.org as a PLIP platform
and decided to use GitHub Issues with PLIP label. Isn't that right ? Kim
was asking for information about that on the GH and, besides
buildout.coredev/docs info is outdated, I couldn't find the label on the
Products.CMFPlone issue tracker.

What was the decided decision about PLIP process ?

R

Johannes Raggam

2015-11-24 13:54:15 UTC

Permalink

Let's discuss that at the meeting. Anyways, my position:

Yes, there was a decision to give up dev.plone.org and use github issues
instead. IIRC, maurits' already made some kind-of plips:

https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1008
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1198

I think we should use dev.plone.org as entry point for developers, where
the most important information/links can be found. e.g. "about the PLIP
process", "PLIP template", "code style guide", "how to contribute".

Regarding the label, the label "04 type: enhancement" comes close to be
a PLIP label, but we need a specific one.

We should keep our Google docs document for managing PLIPs, because
github doesn't offer enough features to replace that (voting,
conditional labels only valid for PLIPs, etc).

Cheers,
Johannes

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
Hey as I can remember we decided to stop dev.plone.org
<http://dev.plone.org> as a PLIP platform and decided to use GitHub
Issues with PLIP label. Isn't that right ? Kim was asking for
information about that on the GH and, besides buildout.coredev/docs info
is outdated, I couldn't find the label on the Products.CMFPlone issue
tracker.
What was the decided decision about PLIP process ?
R
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team

Johannes Raggam

2015-11-24 13:59:02 UTC

Permalink

Sorry, next FWT is December 1st, not today.

Post by Johannes Raggam
Yes, there was a decision to give up dev.plone.org and use github issues
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1008
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1198
I think we should use dev.plone.org as entry point for developers, where
the most important information/links can be found. e.g. "about the PLIP
process", "PLIP template", "code style guide", "how to contribute".
Regarding the label, the label "04 type: enhancement" comes close to be
a PLIP label, but we need a specific one.
We should keep our Google docs document for managing PLIPs, because
github doesn't offer enough features to replace that (voting,
conditional labels only valid for PLIPs, etc).
Cheers,
Johannes

Ramon Navarro Bosch

2015-11-24 14:52:32 UTC

Permalink

What about using this :
http://issuetemplate.com/#/plone/Products.CMFPlone/PLIP

I would disconect dev.plone.org and use the new plone.org (that is going to
be online soon) to add the info we have at

https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/tree/5.0/docs

Ramon

Post by Johannes Raggam
Sorry, next FWT is December 1st, not today.

Jens W. Klein

2015-11-25 14:19:18 UTC

Permalink

After some discussion I introduced the label "03 type: feature" exactly
for plips.
After some discussion the more general word "feature" was preferred and
I renamed it (I first named it "03 type: plip", but after discussions
first at at community.plone.org and then at 2015 conference we renamed it).

Enhancement is a small change with no need to PLIP.

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
What about using this
: http://issuetemplate.com/#/plone/Products.CMFPlone/PLIP

I did not know about issuetemplate, thats really great! Gets a +1 by me.

If we decide to use issuetemplate I propose add a short note about it to
http://docs.plone.org/develop/coredev/docs/guidelines.html and the
longer explanation to http://docs.plone.org/develop/coredev/docs/plips.html

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
I would disconect dev.plone.org <http://dev.plone.org> and use the new
plone.org <http://plone.org> (that is going to be online soon) to add
the info we have at
https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/tree/5.0/docs

Afaik there were already some date announced (Dec.31st?) when
dev.plone.org will be shut down.

Jens

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
Ramon
Sorry, next FWT is December 1st, not today.

Post by Johannes Raggam
Yes, there was a decision to give up dev.plone.org

<http://dev.plone.org> and use github issues

Post by Johannes Raggam
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1008
https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/issues/1198
I think we should use dev.plone.org <http://dev.plone.org> as

entry point for developers, where

Post by Johannes Raggam
the most important information/links can be found. e.g. "about the

PLIP

Post by Johannes Raggam
process", "PLIP template", "code style guide", "how to contribute".
Regarding the label, the label "04 type: enhancement" comes close

to be

Post by Johannes Raggam
a PLIP label, but we need a specific one.
We should keep our Google docs document for managing PLIPs, because
github doesn't offer enough features to replace that (voting,
conditional labels only valid for PLIPs, etc).
Cheers,
Johannes

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
Hey as I can remember we decided to stop dev.plone.org

<http://dev.plone.org>

Post by Johannes Raggam

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
<http://dev.plone.org> as a PLIP platform and decided to use GitHub
Issues with PLIP label. Isn't that right ? Kim was asking for
information about that on the GH and, besides

buildout.coredev/docs info

Post by Johannes Raggam

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
is outdated, I couldn't find the label on the Products.CMFPlone issue
tracker.
What was the decided decision about PLIP process ?
R
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team

--
Klein & Partner KG, member of BlueDynamics Alliance

Franco Pellegrini

2015-11-25 14:39:52 UTC

Permalink

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
http://issuetemplate.com/#/plone/Products.CMFPlone/PLIP

I like this!

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
I would disconect dev.plone.org and use the new plone.org (that is going
to be online soon) to add the info we have at
https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/tree/5.0/docs

I would also disconnect dev.plone.org so it no longer points to the Trac
system, and instead (and I think this is what Johannes meant) would have
dev.plone.org to either be or look like a subsection of plone.org with all
the relevant information for Plone developers

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
Ramon

Cheers,
Franco

Eric Bréhault

2015-11-25 16:49:48 UTC

Permalink

+1 for http://issuetemplate.com/#/plone/Products.CMFPlone/PLIP

Post by Franco Pellegrini

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
http://issuetemplate.com/#/plone/Products.CMFPlone/PLIP

I like this!

Post by Ramon Navarro Bosch
Ramon

Cheers,
Franco
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-framework-team